tiger903

Thank you for allowing me to write in english..! I did not have the opportunity to ride in the two versions. I only drove the 2,2 FDR. I ordered myself the executive with the 3,2 FDR, despite the higher fuel consumption. I was trying to ask you if the numbers i mentioned were right! and who of you drove the two versions and what were youre experiences. IS 220d 3,2 FDR: 4,9 sec from 90-120 in 4th gear IS 220d 2,2 FDR: 5,8 sec from 90-120 in 4th gear alfa 200cv: 4,8 sec alfa 150cv: 7,0 sec laguna 175 cv: 4,7 sec bmw 320d: 6,1 sec audi A4 2.0tdi:7,1 sec

Please allow me to use the english language (you can reply in your own language). In Holland you can order the sport and executive with a changed gearbox. It should improve the accelarations comparing to the original IS 220d (in Holland the business and business luxury. I tried to find some figures and this is what i found on a french forum (yes, we're now all international). il faut relativiser: reprises de 90 à 120 km/h en 4ème: is boite courte: 4,9 s ;) is boite longue:5,8 alfa 200cv: 4,8 alfa 150cv: 7 laguna 175 cv: 4,7 bmw 320d: 6,1 :g: audi A4 2.0tdi:7,1 ;) la lexus en boite "normale" fait jeu égal avec l'alfa 200cv et enterre les autres concurrentes (dont la bmw)sauf la laguna (le poids !) je pense donc que la puissance de 177cv est bien là car pour faire ce temps, on est juste dans la plage de puissance maxi: soit 2922 tr/ mn à 90 et 3896 tr/ mn à 120; je voit mal une lexus de 150 cv faire un aussi bon temps avec un poids théorique de 1630 kg à mouvoir (l'alfa fait 1725 kg controlé par le MA Are you able to tell me more about the advantages of the changed gearbox. I ordered myself a IS 220d Executive earlier this month.